<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conlon O&#039;Sullivan Tax Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie</link>
	<description>Tax Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:42:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Compulsory Purchase Orders</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2012/02/02/compulsory-purchase-orders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2012/02/02/compulsory-purchase-orders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><html /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2012/02/02/compulsory-purchase-orders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our New Office</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/10/13/our-new-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/10/13/our-new-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/10/13/our-new-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have just moved to a new office in
Pavilion House
31 Fitzwilliam Square
Dublin 2
Phone; 01 7759421
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have just moved to a new office in<br />
Pavilion House<br />
31 Fitzwilliam Square<br />
Dublin 2</p>
<p>Phone; 01 7759421</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/10/13/our-new-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil partnership</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/civil-partnership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/civil-partnership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Adviser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The new tax provisions for civil partnership have been published. They affect a wide range of taxes. Essentially, they allow a legal civil partnership the same tax status as marriage. For example civil partners will be entitled to joint assessment for Income Tax

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>The new tax provisions for civil partnership have been published. They affect a wide range of taxes. Essentially, they allow a legal civil partnership the same tax status as marriage. For example civil partners will be entitled to joint assessment for Income Tax</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/civil-partnership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking areas &#8211; good news for taxpayers</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/smoking-areas-good-news-for-taxpayers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/smoking-areas-good-news-for-taxpayers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Adviser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The s moking ban forced many businesses to erect smoking areas. Hotels and bars had to install large facilities to cater for their smoking customers. These would normally class as buildings. As such, they get no capital allowances. An English court case decided that a large gaebo style smoking area attached to a bar building [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The s moking ban forced many businesses to erect smoking areas. Hotels and bars had to install large facilities to cater for their smoking customers. These would normally class as buildings. As such, they get no capital allowances. An English court case decided that a large gaebo style smoking area attached to a bar building by metal fixings counted as plant.</p>
<p>As such it is entitled to capital allowances against taxable profits</p>
<p>Business should review this to see if they can make a claim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/smoking-areas-good-news-for-taxpayers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premises Providers for VAT</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/premises-providers-for-vat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/premises-providers-for-vat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Adviser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People with vacant land or buildings sometimes make them available for sales or auctions and similar events. Owners of premises may also provide them for concerts or other entertainments. These owners need to comply with certain VAT rules where
there are mobile traders not established in Ireland e.g. from Northern Ireland and they will trade for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People with vacant land or buildings sometimes make them available for sales or auctions and similar events. Owners of premises may also provide them for concerts or other entertainments. These owners need to comply with certain VAT rules where</p>
<p>there are mobile traders not established in Ireland e.g. from Northern Ireland and they will trade for less than 28 days at the venue</p>
<p>Where VAT on an activity is due in the place where it is performed. For example, if a venue owner allows a British promoter to run a concert at his premises, the VAT is due in Ireland.</p>
<p>The premises owner  notify Revenue 14 days in advance of the event or trading activity.</p>
<p>If they do not, Revenue may make them jointly liable with the trader or promoter for any VAT due. If the promoter fails to pay the provider will have to foot the bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/07/07/premises-providers-for-vat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New French property tax abandoned</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/06/28/new-french-property-tax-abandoned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/06/28/new-french-property-tax-abandoned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for foreign owners of French residential property. The government proposed new tax on non-residents of 20% of the base value used for the taxe fonciaire has been abandoned.
 This plan met strong opposition on the grounds that it discriminated against non-residents. The opposition was supported by some French senators.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/9d791744-9dae-11e0-b30c-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1QTMeXucx
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for foreign owners of French residential property. The government proposed new tax on non-residents of 20% of the base value used for the taxe fonciaire has been abandoned.</p>
<p> This plan met strong opposition on the grounds that it discriminated against non-residents. The opposition was supported by some French senators.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/9d791744-9dae-11e0-b30c-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1QTMeXucx">http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/9d791744-9dae-11e0-b30c-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1QTMeXucx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/06/28/new-french-property-tax-abandoned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French property owners face new tax</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/05/26/french-property-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/05/26/french-property-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our reading of tax news items we note a proposed new French tax on non-resident property owners. This will be 20% of the property value used to calculate the taxe fonciare, the equivalent of rates.
Discrimination against non-residents would appear to be against EU legislation. owners should consult their French advisers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our reading of tax news items we note a proposed new French tax on non-resident property owners. This will be 20% of the property value used to calculate the taxe fonciare, the equivalent of rates.</p>
<p>Discrimination against non-residents would appear to be against EU legislation. owners should consult their French advisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/05/26/french-property-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pensions Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/05/26/pensions-levy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/05/26/pensions-levy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 11:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
To fund its part of it&#8217;s Jobs initiative the Government is levying a charge on pension funds of .6% of the fund market value at 1st January 2011. The levy will apply to

Occupational Pension Schemes
Personal Pension Schemes
PRSAs

It does not apply to Approved Retirement Funds or Approved Minimum Retirement Funds
There are pension industry concerns in relation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>To fund its part of it&#8217;s Jobs initiative the Government is levying a charge on pension funds of .6% of the fund market value at 1st January 2011. The levy will apply to</p>
<ul>
<li>Occupational Pension Schemes</li>
<li>Personal Pension Schemes</li>
<li>PRSAs</li>
</ul>
<p>It does not apply to Approved Retirement Funds or Approved Minimum Retirement Funds</p>
<p>There are pension industry concerns in relation to this levy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/05/26/pensions-levy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ireland&#8217;s 12.5% Corporation Tax Rate</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/04/26/irelands-12-5-corporation-tax-rate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/04/26/irelands-12-5-corporation-tax-rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This rate has come under sustained attack, particularly from France and Germany. They believe it poaches their companies and tax revenues.
Interestingly, in recent times we have seen two other developments

Gibraltar has a 10% tax rate. A decison by the Advocate General in an ECJ case against this rate viwed this rate was legitimate. Gibraltar was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This rate has come under sustained attack, particularly from France and Germany. They believe it poaches their companies and tax revenues.</p>
<p>Interestingly, in recent times we have seen two other developments</p>
<ul>
<li>Gibraltar has a 10% tax rate. A decison by the Advocate General in an ECJ case against this rate viwed this rate was legitimate. Gibraltar was its own territorial framework for tax purposes.</li>
<li>Northern Ireland is campaigning for a differential 10% Corporation Tax rate. the U.K. Government is considering this.</li>
</ul>
<p>Both of these moves lend credence to our position. Also, I recollect that the 12.5% rate was only introducesd when the 0% rate for Exports and Shannon Relief was abolished. these were similar to the new Northern Ireland proposal and were designate as State Aid by the EU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/04/26/irelands-12-5-corporation-tax-rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preliminary Tax 2011 and Universal Social Charge</title>
		<link>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/04/26/preliminary-tax-2011-and-universal-social-charge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/04/26/preliminary-tax-2011-and-universal-social-charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jconlon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Adviser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Universal Social Charge will affect how you pay Preliminary Tax for the 2011 tax year. This will fall due on 31 October 2011.
before the Social Charge you would have had to pay

90% of your 2011 liability
100% of your 2010 liability
105% of your 2009 liability if paying by direct debit, where 2009 liability greater than zero

Now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Universal Social Charge will affect how you pay Preliminary Tax for the 2011 tax year. This will fall due on 31 October 2011.</p>
<p>before the Social Charge you would have had to pay</p>
<ul>
<li>90% of your 2011 liability</li>
<li>100% of your 2010 liability</li>
<li>105% of your 2009 liability if paying by direct debit, where 2009 liability greater than zero</li>
</ul>
<p>Now these amounts must include an extra provision for the Universal Social Charge.  The charge did not apply for 2010. Therefore, the preliminary Tax should be calculated as if the USC had existed. ROS software is being adjusted to assist the taxpayer in the calculation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conlonosullivan.ie/2011/04/26/preliminary-tax-2011-and-universal-social-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

